Goodwood Revival 2009
- Steve Simmons
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4106
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:45 pm
- Vehicles Owned: .
1937 MG SA Saloon
1946 John Deere AN
1949 MG TC
1953 MG TD
1958 MGA Roadster
1959 Morris Minor 1000
1965 MGB
1967 MGB GT (UK-Spec)
1967 Austin Healey 3000 BJ8
1969 MGC GTS - Location: Co-Nay-Ho Valley
- Contact:
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
I think it's pointing more at the Standard Saloon. Or Austin maybe. Year is between 1920 and 1950. Model is something with letters, and possibly a couple numbers.
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Jimmy,
I can't tell if you mean the Wiilys Jeep MB, 1940 to 1945, or the, I think, 1935 Triumph Gloria. You said American, so I guess you mean the Jeep.
Malcolm
I can't tell if you mean the Wiilys Jeep MB, 1940 to 1945, or the, I think, 1935 Triumph Gloria. You said American, so I guess you mean the Jeep.
Malcolm
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Sorry, Dean.HealeyBN7 wrote:Jimmy wrote:
Now, how many of you can identify the American car in the background, in front of the Healey?
Make, model designation and model years built.
Ok I'll try. 1948 Willy's Model GPW.
Dean
It can't be a '48, as that would've been a civilian model (a CJ, as post war Jeeps were known as until the Wrangler).
Also, it isn't a "straight" Willys, and if so, certainly not a GPW, as that would've been a Ford-made jeep (yes, lower case until '46, when the name was trademarked.
Then again, you just might have hit it right with the GPW designation, as there's no way to tell from the pic if it's a Willys Overland or a Ford-made jeep.
Either way, it'd be an MB, as in military, second generation, or a GPW, as in General Purpose Willys.
Since you were generous to me, I'll give you 1.46 points.
Last edited by Jimmy on Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Malcolm, you get minus two points for not spelling Willys correctly, plus one point for the MB designation (assuming it's not a GPW), minus one point for using an upper case "J" when refering to a jeep, and plus 1-1/2 points for the '40 to '45 production years. It was really '41 to '45.malcolmr18zoy wrote:Jimmy,
I can't tell if you mean the Wiilys Jeep MB, 1940 to 1945, or the, I think, 1935 Triumph Gloria. You said American, so I guess you mean the Jeep.
Malcolm
It's late, and I'm tired, so I'll let Dean sort out the math. You have too many points already, anyway.
Either way, it doesn't have a roof, and played a huge role in preventing us all from driving VWs, Mercedes and BMWs these days.
Guess that makes us all winners. You might as well give everybody an extra point, Dean.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- HealeyBN7
- Core Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:33 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 Peerless GT
1960 Austin Healey 3000
1961 Warwick GT
1971 Lotus Europa
1995 Range Rover - Location: Not Thousand Oaks CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
I consulted with my accountant on options for incorporating the "Jimmy" points - Counsel is concerned that one could draw a linkage from military to defense to government-stimulus-funding and therefor invoke additional oversight, regulation and severely limit the point/bonus system. The "Jimmy" points will secured in an off shore account.
Here is the next challenge. Remember this one is worth 10 points.
Good luck.
Dean
Here is the next challenge. Remember this one is worth 10 points.
Good luck.
Dean
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hey Jimmy,
You know I don't care about points. It's just the challenge. By the way, the jeep was originally an English design by Austin wasn't it? If anyone knows, I guess you will. Why does jeep have to be written in lower case?
Malcolm
You know I don't care about points. It's just the challenge. By the way, the jeep was originally an English design by Austin wasn't it? If anyone knows, I guess you will. Why does jeep have to be written in lower case?
Malcolm
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hi Dean,
That's a difficult one. I think it looks like a Reliant Scimitar. Could be a Sabre because of the wire wheels, not 100% sure. Hope someone has better eyes than me.
Malcolm
That's a difficult one. I think it looks like a Reliant Scimitar. Could be a Sabre because of the wire wheels, not 100% sure. Hope someone has better eyes than me.
Malcolm
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
It's a Chevy Carryall, apparently ready to tow the little white car behind it.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Alright, Malcolm, you asked for it.malcolmr18zoy wrote:Hey Jimmy,
You know I don't care about points. It's just the challenge. By the way, the jeep was originally an English design by Austin wasn't it? If anyone knows, I guess you will. Why does jeep have to be written in lower case?
Malcolm
The almighty Land Rover prototype was built on a Jeep FC 150 chassis, a somewhat rare cabover version of the common CJ5.
Perhaps because the Brits couldn't decide on how to mount the steering wheel on the wrong side, they put it in the middle, with seating for a passenger on either side of the driver.
Now, doesn't that make you proud to be of English decent?
As for the lower case jeep, it's appropriate for all the military versions through '45.
When Willys Overland trademarked the name it became the familiar upper case Jeep, used on Civilian Jeeps (that's what CJ stands for) and military ones alike.
And I believe that Austin indeed made a half *** attempt at copying the jeep - which obviously didn't work out too well.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- Larry Kluss
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:28 pm
- Vehicles Owned: -
1967 MGB (Works tribute)
1968 E-type Jaguar FHC
1974 Chevy Nova SS (faux)
2000 Ford Ranger XLT
2008 Jaguar XJ L - Location: Conejo Valley
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Malcom knows them all.malcolmr18zoy wrote:Hi Dean,
That's a difficult one. I think it looks like a Reliant Scimitar. Could be a Sabre because of the wire wheels, not 100% sure. Hope someone has better eyes than me.
Malcolm
![Bow :bow:](./images/smilies/bow.gif)
It is a Scimitar, GT SE4, circa 1964. The Sabre is earlier and has a more rounded off body, a bit like an early Spitfire.
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hey Larry,
Don't forget to call it a Scimitar Coupe. I can identify the year as 1968 because of the licence plate.
Malcolm
Don't forget to call it a Scimitar Coupe. I can identify the year as 1968 because of the licence plate.
Malcolm
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hey Jimmy,
The original Landrover prototype was built in 1945. Did they have CJs then? I beleive it was built on an ex military MB chassis. Check your origins of jeep. I think it was a design by Austin, rejected by the British military, and taken by the US military. That may just be my English ego shining through, but you could research it!
Malcolm
The original Landrover prototype was built in 1945. Did they have CJs then? I beleive it was built on an ex military MB chassis. Check your origins of jeep. I think it was a design by Austin, rejected by the British military, and taken by the US military. That may just be my English ego shining through, but you could research it!
Malcolm
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hmm, I thought they used an FC 150, but if it was in '45, that couldn't be.
Must've been an MB or GPW, then. They should've been plentiful, as opposed to an early CJ.
If it was a floor shift, it wasn't a CJ, since the early ones had column shifters.
The CJ designation began with '46 model years, but could well have been in existance in late '45.
Willys wasn't too particular with year models - for example, my Jeep (a CJ 3A) was built on February 23 1952, yet was identified and sold as a '51.
That's a bit different than today's market, where you will be able to buy a 2011 year model vehicle any day now.
Must've been an MB or GPW, then. They should've been plentiful, as opposed to an early CJ.
If it was a floor shift, it wasn't a CJ, since the early ones had column shifters.
The CJ designation began with '46 model years, but could well have been in existance in late '45.
Willys wasn't too particular with year models - for example, my Jeep (a CJ 3A) was built on February 23 1952, yet was identified and sold as a '51.
That's a bit different than today's market, where you will be able to buy a 2011 year model vehicle any day now.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:14 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 38 MG SA
47 MG TC
50 Renault 4CV
67 Triumph Spitfire
88 Toyota MR2 - Location: Van Nuys
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
from Wikipedia, and I have seen the same story several times, American Austi (Bantam) designed the jeepHey Jimmy,
The original Landrover prototype was built in 1945. Did they have CJs then? I beleive it was built on an ex military MB chassis. Check your origins of jeep. I think it was a design by Austin, rejected by the British military, and taken by the US military. That may just be my English ego shining through, but you could research it!
The origins of the vehicle: the first jeeps
Bantam BRC 40
Dashboard of World War II era jeep.
Jeep with 50 cal. Browning machine gun
The first jeep prototype (the Bantam BRC) was built for the United States Army Quartermaster Corps (QMC) by American Bantam in Butler, Pennsylvania,[2] followed by two other competing prototypes produced by Ford and Willys-Overland. The American Bantam Car Company actually built and designed the vehicle that first met the Army's criteria, but its engine did not meet the Army's torque requirements. Plus, the Army felt that the company was too small to supply the number needed and it allowed Willys and Ford to make second attempts on their designs after seeing Bantam's vehicle in action.
Quantities (1,500) of each of the three models were then extensively field tested. During the bidding process for 16,000 "jeeps", Willys-Overland's chief engineer Delmar "Barney" Roos made extensive design changes to meet a revised weight specification (a maximum of 2,175 lb (987 kg), including oil and water). He was thus able to retain a powerful but comparatively heavy engine, and thus won the initial contract. Willys had designed what would become the standardized jeep, designating it a model MB military vehicle and building it at their plant in Toledo, Ohio.
After another round of testing in June 1941, the three designs from Bantam, Ford, and Willys were judged acceptable, with the Willys model having a more powerful engine and transmission, as well as a stronger frame and radiator.[3] The QMC moved to release contracts for mass production. Bantam was not prepared as Ford or Willys to undertake large-scale production despite its early role in developing the basic design.[3] Although the QMC supported the production to Ford, the experiences in World War I made the Army insistent on standardization.[3] Ford made a concession to manufacture the Willis design, and "sweetened" the deal by providing tooling for critical components which would be bottlenecks for mass-production (axles, constant velocity joints, and transfer cases).[3] Willys also decided to offer their design as an "irrevocable non-exclusive license to the U.S. Government" rather than risk losing business in a future "winner-take-all" contract.[3]
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Well Gene,
I guess you shot me down in flames there, but that was very interesting. Thankyou for that insight into the history of one of the world's groundbreaking, milestone vehicles.
Malcolm
I guess you shot me down in flames there, but that was very interesting. Thankyou for that insight into the history of one of the world's groundbreaking, milestone vehicles.
Malcolm
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Yep, it was indeed Bantam, but certainly not Austin, that made the first prototype.
However, if you look at photos of those Bantam cars, they had little resemblance to what became the jeep.
Then again, so did Willys Overland's MA model.
The now famous grille was actually a contribution from Ford. About the only "Better Idea" Ford ever had, I think. (Well, that and stopping production of the Pinto).
So, Malcolm, even if Karl Probst for some reason drove - or ever owned - an Austin, it doesn't exactly make Austin the originator.
Good thing, too, I suppose, or the poor motor pool guys would probably still be out there in the fields of Germany trying to figure out the Whitworth fasteners.
However, if you look at photos of those Bantam cars, they had little resemblance to what became the jeep.
Then again, so did Willys Overland's MA model.
The now famous grille was actually a contribution from Ford. About the only "Better Idea" Ford ever had, I think. (Well, that and stopping production of the Pinto).
So, Malcolm, even if Karl Probst for some reason drove - or ever owned - an Austin, it doesn't exactly make Austin the originator.
Good thing, too, I suppose, or the poor motor pool guys would probably still be out there in the fields of Germany trying to figure out the Whitworth fasteners.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hey Dean,
Are you out of town? I was waiting anxiously for your response to our guesses on the last car! Also to your next challenge. Hope everything is good with you.
Malcolm
Are you out of town? I was waiting anxiously for your response to our guesses on the last car! Also to your next challenge. Hope everything is good with you.
Malcolm
- HealeyBN7
- Core Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:33 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 Peerless GT
1960 Austin Healey 3000
1961 Warwick GT
1971 Lotus Europa
1995 Range Rover - Location: Not Thousand Oaks CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Sorry for the sluggish response. I got busy with sanding the Lotus (never ending) and getting the computer to work in the barn - still doesn't. Now traveling again, but all is well.malcolmr18zoy wrote:Hey Larry,
Don't forget to call it a Scimitar Coupe. I can identify the year as 1968 because of the licence plate.
Malcolm
I thought the MGB guys would be all confused by the door and side profile on the Scimitar Coupe. From the angle of the photo, it looked to me like they lifted the door right off an MGB and built the rest of the car around it. Yet, there is no real MGB reference. I would post a photo of the front, but it is just too French-o-strange and I will leave it to you to look it up and draw your own conclusions. Sure does not match the back.
With that last one worth 10 points, Malcolm pulls way ahead. Here is what I have for points.
Gene + 1
Malcolm + 17.5
Steve + 2
Larry + 5.0
Tannyo + 1
Jimmy + 1
The next challenge will be worth 20 points. You do know why the points are increasing...
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Best of luck. The next one will not be as hard, so you will have to be fast. The winner will either be camped on the computer or have their notifications wired to their mobil device.
Dean
- HealeyBN7
- Core Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:33 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 Peerless GT
1960 Austin Healey 3000
1961 Warwick GT
1971 Lotus Europa
1995 Range Rover - Location: Not Thousand Oaks CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Just for the record. Reliant is a British car. I don't think there is any French connection what so ever. DeanHealeyBN7 wrote:I would post a photo of the front, but it is just too French-o-strange and I will leave it to you to look it up and draw your own conclusions. Sure does not match the back.
Dean
- malcolmr18zoy
- Core Member
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 MGA 1600 Coupe
1949 MG TC
1965 Jaguar 3.8S
1966 MGB GT
1964 MG Midget
1985 BMW 528i
1990 Jaguar XJS V12 convertible
1995 Landrover Discovery
2003 BMW 325i wagon.(wife's car) - Location: Big Bear City, CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Hi Dean,
good to hear from you. I don't think there is any French connection with the Reliants, but there is an Israeli connection. I beleive the Sabre was built in Israel and called the Sabra.
Malcolm
good to hear from you. I don't think there is any French connection with the Reliants, but there is an Israeli connection. I beleive the Sabre was built in Israel and called the Sabra.
Malcolm
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Uh, it's either because of the general state of the economy (i.e. inflation), or Malcolm has some dirt on you.HealeyBN7 wrote: The next challenge will be worth 20 points. You do know why the points are increasing...![]()
Dean
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
- HealeyBN7
- Core Member
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:33 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 1959 Peerless GT
1960 Austin Healey 3000
1961 Warwick GT
1971 Lotus Europa
1995 Range Rover - Location: Not Thousand Oaks CA
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Finally a little less traveling for a bit.
Here it is...somewhat fitting. Need the make and model of the base vehicle and the special designation and maker for the additional feature. Assuming you can spot the additional feature:)
Good luck. Remember this is worth 20 points.
Dean
PS: Points are increasing so you can catch up with Malcolm in one or two emails, without working at it until 2012:)
Here it is...somewhat fitting. Need the make and model of the base vehicle and the special designation and maker for the additional feature. Assuming you can spot the additional feature:)
Good luck. Remember this is worth 20 points.
Dean
PS: Points are increasing so you can catch up with Malcolm in one or two emails, without working at it until 2012:)
- Jimmy
- Don't take him seriously!
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:25 pm
- Vehicles Owned: '74-1/2 MGB
'76 MGB (parts car)
'52 TD
'71 MGB staqtion wagon
'69 MGB (parts car)
'60 Sprite
'79 MG Midget (parts car)
'63 LBC
Plus, a Turbo S (with a damn roof) in the household.
And three Mercedes on 20" wheels. - Location: NM
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
My guess is that it's Triumph TR5 that did something really bad, and got a roof attached as punishment.
In baseball, running into someone is apparently a "collision".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
But doing the same thing in a car somehow makes it an "accident".
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:14 pm
- Vehicles Owned: 38 MG SA
47 MG TC
50 Renault 4CV
67 Triumph Spitfire
88 Toyota MR2 - Location: Van Nuys
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
Triumph TR4
special features: engine from a Massey Ferguson tractor
hardtop roof by Jimmy Nylund Limited provides extra comfort and improves aerodynamics
special features: engine from a Massey Ferguson tractor
hardtop roof by Jimmy Nylund Limited provides extra comfort and improves aerodynamics
- Steve Simmons
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4106
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:45 pm
- Vehicles Owned: .
1937 MG SA Saloon
1946 John Deere AN
1949 MG TC
1953 MG TD
1958 MGA Roadster
1959 Morris Minor 1000
1965 MGB
1967 MGB GT (UK-Spec)
1967 Austin Healey 3000 BJ8
1969 MGC GTS - Location: Co-Nay-Ho Valley
- Contact:
Re: Goodwood Revival 2009
I'm going to guess a Tr4 with a Lenham top.